ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Cardiotoxicity Induced by Targeted Cancer Therapies: Understanding the Risks and Developing Solutions.
Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiotoxicity of Targeted Cancer Therapies: Expanding the Translational Horizon.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Heart failure induced by cancer therapies: focus on targeted agents, mechanisms, risk prediction, and clinical management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiotoxicity has emerged as a major clinical concern associated with targeted cancer therapies. While these agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), HER2 inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, revolutionize cancer treatment by selectively modulating tumor-associated molecular pathways, they inadvertently disrupt cardiovascular homeostasis due to the overlap of signaling mechanisms between tumorigenesis and cardiac physiology.
objectivesThis review aims to elucidate the mechanisms underlying cardiotoxicity induced by targeted cancer therapies, outline diagnostic and preventive strategies, and highlight emerging approaches in cardio-oncology for optimizing patient outcomes.
methodsAn integrative review of preclinical and clinical studies was conducted to analyze the cardiovascular effects of major targeted therapeutic classes. Mechanistic insights, diagnostic modalities, monitoring protocols, and ongoing clinical trials were critically examined to establish a translational perspective.
resultsTargeted therapies induce cardiotoxicity through multiple pathways, including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, endothelial injury, and immune-mediated inflammation. Clinically, these effects manifest as hypertension, arrhythmias, heart failure, and myocardial ischemia. Diagnostic evaluation relies on echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin, BNP), and electrocardiography. Preventive and management strategies encompass baseline cardiovascular assessment, dose adjustment, use of cardioprotective agents, and continuous cardiac monitoring. Advances in cardio-oncology have promoted multidisciplinary management and integration of cardiovascular surveillance into cancer care protocols.
conclusionThe growing prevalence of cardiotoxicity among cancer survivors underscores the need for collaborative, multidisciplinary care involving oncologists, cardiologists, and researchers. Individualized therapy guided by predictive biomarkers and novel imaging tools holds promise for balancing therapeutic efficacy with cardiovascular safety, thereby improving long-term survivorship and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108451What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.