Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108574›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Molecular-physiological model integration revolutionizes cereal flowering prediction.

Enli Wang, Hamish Brown, Bangyou Zheng, Zhigan Zhao, Neil Huth, James R Hunt, Jessica Hyles, Maxwell Bloomfield, Corinne Celestina, Kenton Porker and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic prediction vs. gene-based crop models: a case study on rice trait prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Enli Wang *CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-5791
Hamish Brown *The New Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science Limited, Private Bag 4604, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-8027
Bangyou ZhengCSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, Qld, 4067, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-0970
Zhigan ZhaoCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-7215
Neil HuthCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Forest Hill, Qld, 4342, Australia.
James R HuntDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086, Australia.
Jessica HylesCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-4334
Maxwell BloomfieldDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0064-2332
Corinne CelestinaDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0840-9276
Kenton PorkerCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-8549
Felicity HarrisNSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-8857
Ben BiddulphDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development, East Perth, WA, 6151, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-2558
Katia StefanovaStatistics for the Australian Grains Industry West, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Ben TrevaskisCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7277-4994

Funding

Grains Research and Development Corporation ULA00011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid prediction and control of flowering time is essential for breeding crops resilient to changing climates. Current models often fail to predict flowering time in new cultivars because molecular models lack integration of environmental signals, while physiological models inadequately capture the interactions of vernalization, photoperiod and temperature. This leads to mischaracterized genotypes and inaccurate forecasts. A new Cereal Anthesis Molecular Phenology (CAMP) model was developed for wheat. It explicitly integrates the regulatory roles of three major 'virtual' flowering genes (Vrn1, Vrn2, and Vrn3) with environmental cues. A novel phenotyping strategy based on main stem leaf number was introduced to shorten the time required for data collection and model calibration. CAMP predicted flowering time within 4-7 d across 64 genetically diverse wheat cultivars grown under contrasting environments. The leaf-number phenotyping method reduced phenotyping time by more than 80%, offering a practical alternative to resource-intensive field trials. Together, these advances enable accurate cultivar characterization and scalable prediction of flowering behaviour. CAMP enables the ability to predict flowering time directly from genotypic data (e.g. SNPs), eliminating the need for costly controlled-environment experiments. This represents a step change in molecular-physiological modelling, supporting faster deployment of new cultivars and more effective design of wheat for future climates.

Indexed as

Edible GrainFlowersModels, BiologicalTriticumGenotypePhenotypePhotoperiodPlant LeavesTime Factorsflowering timegene expressionmolecular–physiological modelphenological developmentphenotypingphotoperiodvernalizationwheat

Identifiers

PMID41108574
PMCPMC12780314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.