Observational studyMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2026
Laser treatment of oral vascular anomalies. A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral vascular anomalies, though benign, may impact comfort and aesthetics, particularly in visible or functional areas. Laser therapies have gained prominence due to their precision, minimal invasiveness, and favourable outcomes. This study aimed to analyse the laser treatment modalities for oral vascular anomalies and their respective outcomes in a population of the north of Portugal. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective study analysed 111 vascular anomalies in 95 patients treated between January 2011 and May 2025 in the University Clinics of IUCS-CESPU. Data on demographics, type and location of vascular anomalies, treatment (Nd:YAG, CO2 or diode laser), and outcomes were collected.
resultsVenous lakes were the most frequent diagnosis (n=77;69.4%) and lip was the most common location (n=81;73%). Induced photocoagulation (IPC) (n=79;71.2%), essentially with Nd:YAG, was the predominant technique. Recurrence was observed in 4 cases (3.6%), healing occurred mostly ≤21 days (n=88; 79.3%), scar tissue was present in 10 cases (9%), pain was reported in 29 patients (26.1%) (mean of 0.85±0.14), and satisfaction was high (n=103; 92.8%). No major complications were observed. Logistic regression analysis showed that larger vascular anomalies were associated with delayed healing (p=0.009) and scar formation correlated with presence of pain (one day after intervention) (p=0.03) and recurrence (p=0.039).
conclusionsLaser-based management in particular, IPC, is a safe, effective, and well tolerated option for the treatment of small oral vascular anomalies. Prospective studies are encouraged to optimize protocols and standardize the technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.