Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41109918›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026

Reconsidering the definition of triple-negative breast cancer in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era: an optimal cut-off value for hormone receptor percentage of HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.

Takeo Fujii, Toshiaki Iwase, Yu Shen, Jami Fukui, Naoto T Ueno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. NCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takeo FujiiWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-2688
Toshiaki IwaseUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Yu ShenThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-7868
Jami FukuiUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Naoto T UenoUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA. nueno@cc.hawaii.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-7275

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Elucidating the role of thrombosis and inflammation in breast cancer metastasisZIABC012130 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FUJII, TAKEO · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Integration of Multiple Data Sources toward Precision Cancer MedicineR01CA269696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JING NING, YU SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC012130NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269696U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA016672U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA07189U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) ZIA BC 012130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal cut-off values of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression to define the positivity of ER and PgR have been under discussion for over a decade but remain controversial. The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) and the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus recommended that breast cancers with ≥1% of ER or PgR expression should be considered hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors but ER/PR expression of 1% to 10% should be reported as HR-low positive; however, among HER2-negative disease, data on the overall benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapies for patients with HR-low positive disease is limited, resulting in the revisiting of the definition of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Defining HR-low positive disease by better understanding the biology is essential because of the recent advancement of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for TNBC. Additionally, identifying who should be treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, particularly those who have HR-low HER2-negative disease, which is currently treated as TNBC without adjuvant endocrine therapy, is a clinical unmet need. In clinical practice, treating physicians have tailored systemic treatment strategies using other clinical and pathological factors (i.e., age, grade, Ki-67, tumor size, lymph node involvement). There is no universal practice to treat patients with HR-low HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarized the currently available data to define the clinically relevant optimal cut-off values of ER/PgR in neoadjuvant- and adjuvant-setting. We recommend considering creating a novel category of triple-negative like breast cancer (TN-like BC), which will require a therapeutic strategy different from conventional TNBC.

Indexed as

Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID41109918
PMCPMC12555794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.