ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Optimal endovascular strategy for femoropopliteal claudication and infrapopliteal CLTI: a network meta-analysis stratified by lesion length.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of stenting in femoropopliteal disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of proportions.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Pooled it
- Risk Stratification in Cardiovascular Medicine for Prognostic Assessment and Therapeutic Decision-Making: From Atrial Fibrillation to the Broader Disease Spectrum.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While numerous endovascular technologies exist for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD), evidence guiding device selection based on lesion length is limited. We therefore conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of contemporary endovascular therapy (EVT) strategies, stratified by clinical presentation and lesion length. Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251031338), we searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nine contemporary endovascular therapy (EVT) modalities for femoropopliteal intermittent claudication (IC) or infrapopliteal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Analyses were stratified by lesion length (short vs. long) for each clinical subgroup. Primary outcomes were primary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation and all-cause mortality at multiple follow-up intervals. Seventy seven RCTs involving 11,788 patients were included. For short femoropopliteal IC lesions (≤ 73.0 mm), drug-coated balloon (DCB) and covered stent were most effective for maintaining patency. For long femoropopliteal lesions (> 73.0 mm), atherectomy with DCB (AT-DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) demonstrated superior patency. In short infrapopliteal CLTI lesions (≤ 44.1 mm), DES provided the most consistent benefits in both patency and freedom from TLR. For long infrapopliteal lesions (> 44.1 mm), AT-DCB was the most effective strategy for improving primary patency. Importantly, no significant differences in major amputation or mortality were detected among strategies in most subgroups. The optimal endovascular strategy for LEAD appears to be highly dependent on lesion length, supporting a shift towards a more individualized treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41110014What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.