Evidence mapPaperPMID 41111002Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Stress and Support Present in Medical Crowdfunding in Pediatric Cancer.

Mary K Killela, Sandra Garcia, Jessica Keim-Malpass, Sandra Soto, Todd Schwartz, Jessica Williams, Sheila Santacroce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary K KillelaHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8826-673X
Sandra GarciaSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jessica Keim-MalpassSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-8556
Sandra SotoSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6423-9473
Todd SchwartzSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0232-2543
Jessica WilliamsSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-0296
Sheila SantacroceSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-8069

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · 1996 to 2025
$3.1M
Interventions for Preventing and Managing Chronic IllnessNINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091NINR NIH HHS T32NR007091Nurses Educational Funds Inc.Rita and Alex Hillman FoundationUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HIllUniversity of Utah
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical crowdfunding (MCF) seeks to mitigate the financial harm to families with a child with cancer.

aimsWe sought to describe the illness phases, campaign creators, and the main topics discussed on MCF pages. METHODS AND

resultsUsing publicly available campaigns on GoFundMe.com, we randomly selected 100 campaigns to extract information on stressors, appraisals, and additional attributes. We conducted descriptive statistics to describe the distributions of illness phases, creators, and topics, and Fisher's exact test to explore patterns in topics by illness phase and topics by creators. Primary therapy was the most common illness phase (75%), and friend or family of the child with cancer was the most common campaign creator (76%). In 30/76 friend or family creators, a parent posted updates. The most common financial stressors were deductibles/co-pay costs (60%), employment disruptions (58%), and treatment-related travel (47%). Nearly all campaigns mentioned non-financial stressors including describing the illness (88%) and the path to diagnosis (86%). Most campaigns included a tertiary appraisal of worthiness to explain why their child (75%) or the family (49%) was worthy of donations. Most campaigns provided emotional support (84%), few provided peer support (22%), and even fewer provided informational support (10%). There were many significant differences in topics by type of creator and few by illness phase.

conclusionsFriends and family are most active in creating campaigns near the beginning of a child's cancer journey. Campaigners share information both to update and to convince donors to support them. Future work should explore the consequences of parents engaging in MCF.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingFinancial StressFund RaisingNeoplasmsSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalChildFemaleHumansMalechildhood cancercost of illnessfinancial burdenfinancial supportsocial networkingsocial support

Identifiers

PMID41111002
PMCPMC12535798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.