ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Clinical and Biochemical Characterization of Fabry Disease Associated GLA Gene Variants: Data From a Large Cohort of 469 Thousand Genotyped Subjects of the UK Biobank Database.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of cardiovascular risk factors in non-classical Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Integrated Clinical, Molecular, and Machine Learning Assessment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of agalsidase Beta (fabrazyme) in Chinese fabry disease patients with proteinuria: a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and Biochemical Characterization of Fabry Disease Associated GLA Gene Variants: Data From a Large Cohort of 469 Thousand Genotyped Subjects of the UK Biobank Database.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fabry disease (FD) is a lysosomal storage disease due to genetic variants in the GLA gene located on the X chromosome. Males are hemizygous, while many females are genetic mosaics due to the random inactivation of the X chromosome. While most of the identified variants are deleterious for GLA, in some cases, less rare gene variants have been considered responsible for some FD features. GLA variants were selected from the database of 469 thousand genotyped subjects of the UK Biobank database. Pathogenic variants (ALL_P), variants of uncertain significance (ALL_U), and variants with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (ALL_C) were grouped, while p.Asp313Tyr, p.Ala143Thr, p.Ser126Gly, p.Arg118Cys, and p.Asn215Ser were evaluated individually. More than 480 thousand subjects not carrying variants in the GLA gene were used as controls in association studies. Clinical and biochemical phenotypes were extracted from the same database, and a FD phenotype score (FASTEX derived Fabry, FDF score) was derived from the FASTEX prognostic to assess the probability of an FD phenotype score. Pathogenic variants and p.Asn215Ser were associated with FDF score, while all other variants were not associated with any FDF feature. Stratification of patients based on a calculated cardiovascular (CV) risk score demonstrated that patients with nonpathogenic variants within the highest CV risk quartile (> 75th percentile) showed characteristic features of FD, whereas those in the lower risk group (< 75th percentile) showed odds ratios indicating inverse association with FD features. In conclusion, the data from UK Biobank suggest that pathogenic variants are always associated with FD features, while variants of uncertain significance and conflicting interpretation acquire an FD phenotype only in the presence of a high CV risk burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.