ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Exploring the pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness, and toxicological features of anticancer flavonoids: a Boulevard to explore their clinical translational potential.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Insights into Dihydromyricetin: Redox Modulation and Kinase-Mediated Control of Disease Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- In Vitro Cell Viability and Migration Inhibitory Effects of Isorhamnetin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Dietary Polyphenols (Flavonoids) Derived from Plants for Use in Therapeutic Health: Antioxidant Performance, ROS, Molecular Mechanisms, and Bioavailability Limitations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Recent Advancements in Bioactive Natural Products and Nanoparticle-Mediated Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flavonoids that are widely distributed across various plant species exhibit significant anticancer activity in various preclinical and clinical studies, thus offering promising therapeutic prospects. However, a thorough understanding of their pharmacokinetic properties, drug-likeness characteristics, and safety profile is essential for the translational applicability of these molecules into clinical settings. Methods: A systematic search was carried out using various electronic databases such as PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Clinical Registry, and Google Scholar, using different keywords like "flavonoids", "cancer", "pharmacokinetics", "toxicity", "tumor", and their combinations. Non-English literature was excluded due to language barriers, limited accessibility, non-indexing, and the risk of misinterpreting methods or results, which could compromise the accuracy and reliability of the review. Results and discussion: This review provides an in-depth overview of various mechanistic pathways, such as oxidative stress-mediated and immunomodulatory pathways, that are considered to be responsible for the anti-cancer potential of flavonoids. In addition, the pharmacokinetic properties and toxicity profile of flavonoids have been discussed, which are the crucial factors in their clinical translation. Lastly, the review briefly explores various strategies that can be adopted to improve the effectiveness of flavonoids in the treatment of cancer. Conclusion: This investigation enhances our understanding of the translational potential of flavonoid-based therapies by highlighting these essential elements, bringing us one step closer to the development of effective and safe cancer treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.