ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
A narrative review of barriers to and promotion strategies for female college students' sports participation in a cross-cultural context.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-risk influencing factors associated with physical inactivity and gender differences among Chinese university students in 2024.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Longitudinal trends and sociodemographic inequalities in comorbid insufficient physical activity and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents and young adults, 2016-2022.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring resilience in sports participation and self-assessed leadership among women in Malaysia: a mixed-methods approach.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A social-ecological analysis of facilitators and barriers to campus fitness engagement: multilevel evidence from Chinese universities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Analysis of lifestyle factors associated with physical activity participation among university female students using deep belief networks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Resistance Training Participation and Beliefs Among Adolescent Athletes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A psychological network analysis of parental and peer support on children's football participation: the bridging role of self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female university students face significant barriers to sports participation across diverse cultural contexts, despite its well-documented benefits for physical and mental health. Through a narrative review of 18 studies, this paper synthesizes barriers and identifies multi-level promotion strategies. Findings reveal four interconnected dimensions of obstacles: (a) Physiological barriers, including menstrual health concerns and heightened injury risks due to inadequate skills/knowledge; (b) Psychological barriers, characterized by body image anxiety, low self-efficacy, and trauma from negative past experiences; (c) Sociocultural barriers, manifesting as gendered stereotypes, lack of social support, and religious-cultural norms restricting participation (e.g., modesty requirements); and (d) Environmental barriers, encompassing male-dominated facilities, unsafe/inaccessible spaces, and climate-related discomfort. To address these challenges, the review proposes integrated interventions: (a) Physiological strategies include cycle-adapted exercise plans and injury-prevention education; (b) Psychological strategies focus on trauma-informed cognitive restructuring and graduated achievement systems; (c) Sociocultural strategies involve deconstructing gender biases through media representation and creating faith-sensitive spaces (e.g., women-only facilities with visual isolation); (d) Environmental strategies prioritize gender-responsive spatial redesign (e.g., reserved time slots, repurposed underutilized areas). This promotes female college students' enthusiasm for sports participation and even encourages them to reconstruct the socio-cultural pressures they face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.