Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112652›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

A narrative review of barriers to and promotion strategies for female college students' sports participation in a cross-cultural context.

Jiajin Zhou, Chuchen Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiajin ZhouInstitute of Physical Education and Health, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China.
Chuchen LiuCollege of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female university students face significant barriers to sports participation across diverse cultural contexts, despite its well-documented benefits for physical and mental health. Through a narrative review of 18 studies, this paper synthesizes barriers and identifies multi-level promotion strategies. Findings reveal four interconnected dimensions of obstacles: (a) Physiological barriers, including menstrual health concerns and heightened injury risks due to inadequate skills/knowledge; (b) Psychological barriers, characterized by body image anxiety, low self-efficacy, and trauma from negative past experiences; (c) Sociocultural barriers, manifesting as gendered stereotypes, lack of social support, and religious-cultural norms restricting participation (e.g., modesty requirements); and (d) Environmental barriers, encompassing male-dominated facilities, unsafe/inaccessible spaces, and climate-related discomfort. To address these challenges, the review proposes integrated interventions: (a) Physiological strategies include cycle-adapted exercise plans and injury-prevention education; (b) Psychological strategies focus on trauma-informed cognitive restructuring and graduated achievement systems; (c) Sociocultural strategies involve deconstructing gender biases through media representation and creating faith-sensitive spaces (e.g., women-only facilities with visual isolation); (d) Environmental strategies prioritize gender-responsive spatial redesign (e.g., reserved time slots, repurposed underutilized areas). This promotes female college students' enthusiasm for sports participation and even encourages them to reconstruct the socio-cultural pressures they face.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSportsStudentsCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansUniversitiesYoung Adultbarrierscross-cultural contextfemale college studentsnarrative reviewsports participation

Identifiers

PMID41112652
PMCPMC12528154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.