ReviewMedical science educator2025
Student Engagement in Curriculum Development for Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.
Review in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the feedback: a student-directed case-based collaborative learning Review committee.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Designing equitable and inclusive assessments in pharmacology: Insights from education practices in medical sciences.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Student Engagement from the Medical Trainees' Perspective and Associated Factors: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.JMA journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Students should play more prominent roles as partners rather than merely as receivers in medical education. Therefore, engaging students in collaborative work in curriculum development (CD) is fundamental. This scoping review aimed to explore the extent of research on student engagement in CD. The data was extracted from 50 included articles based on the important components of student engagement (i.e., role, format, recruitment methods, impacts and recommendations). We found that the scope of student engagement in CD-related studies was confined into specific geographical areas. Expanding further studies to establish a more culturally sensitive student engagement in CD is strongly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.