ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Construction of a predictive model for severe hypertriglyceridemia-associated acute pancreatitis using machine learning.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Triglyceride Threshold for Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Acute Hyper-Triglyceridemic Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify critical risk factors distinguishing severe hypertriglyceridemia-associated acute pancreatitis (SAP-HTG) from its non-severe form (N-SAP-HTG). Machine learning techniques were used to develop predictive models and compare them to conventional scoring systems, aiming to enhance early diagnosis and risk stratification of SAP-HTG.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 514 patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to HanZhong Central Hospital between August 2018 and June 2024, including 90 SAP-HTG and 424 N-SAP-HTG cases. Key baseline characteristics, scoring indices (APACHE II, Ranson), and laboratory data (fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), C-reactive protein (CRP)) were collected. LASSO regression was used to identify key predictors, and multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess their associations. Four predictive models - logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost - were developed. Model performance was evaluated using the confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and SHAP analysis, with comparisons to APACHE II and Ranson scores. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 26.0 and R 4.3.3.
resultsNine predictors were identified: age, diabetes history, FBG, TyG index, amylase (AMY), TG, total cholesterol (TC), CRP, and Ca
conclusionMachine learning models effectively identified SAP-HTG risk factors, with XGBoost showing superior performance over conventional scoring systems. These models provide a valuable tool for early diagnosis and risk stratification of SAP-HTG in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.