Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113252›Full record

ReviewPeer-to-peer networking and applications2025

Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.

Kun Li, Ankur Lohachab, Michel Dumontier, Visara Urovi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Peer-to-peer networking and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun LiInstitute of Data Science (IDS), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, 6211 LK The Netherlands.
Ankur LohachabInstitute of Data Science (IDS), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, 6211 LK The Netherlands.
Michel DumontierInstitute of Data Science (IDS), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, 6211 LK The Netherlands.
Visara UroviInstitute of Data Science (IDS), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, 6211 LK The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blockchain technology promises enhanced data ownership, control, and interoperability in healthcare, yet security and privacy concerns continue to hinder its adoption. Existing surveys examine blockchain-based privacy challenges, but they lack a systematic analysis and maturity evaluation of privacy-preserving techniques tailored to healthcare data sharing. This paper presents a systematic review of blockchain-based privacy-preserving solutions, analyzing blockchain details, applied privacy methods, regulatory compliance, and maturity levels using Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Our findings reveal that authentication and authorization is the most explored stage, dominated by smart contracts and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. Proxy re-encryption is frequently used for data transfer, while privacy-preserving search and verification remain underexplored. On/off-chain mechanisms are commonly applied to balance privacy and storage efficiency. TRL assessment shows that most solutions remain at the proof-of-concept stage (TRL3), with only limited progress to prototype validation (TRL4-TRL5), highlighting the gap between experimental designs and real-world deployment. To guide developers and researchers, we identify two primary patterns of blockchain integration and propose a framework for system design. We also compare methods across data-sharing stages, outlining their strengths and limitations to support informed selection. In conclusion, while research interest is growing, the field remains at an early stage of maturity. Addressing this gap requires stronger implementation capacity, access to clinical data, and robust regulatory alignment. We emphasize the importance of clinical validation and real-world testing to advance privacy-preserving blockchain solutions toward practical adoption in healthcare.

Indexed as

BlockchainHealthcare data sharingPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID41113252
PMCPMC12534302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.