Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113446›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in network physiology2025

Biological detail and graph structure in network neuroscience.

David Papo, Javier M Buldú

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David PapoDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Javier M BuldúComplex Systems Group & GISC, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representing the brain as a complex network typically involves approximations of both biological detail and network structure. Here, we discuss the sort of biological detail that may improve network models of brain activity and, conversely, how standard network structure may be refined to more directly address additional neural properties. It is argued that generalised structures face the same fundamental issues related to intrinsicality, universality and functional meaningfulness of standard network models. Ultimately finding the appropriate level of biological and network detail will require understanding how given network structure can perform specific functions, but also a better characterisation of neurophysiological stylised facts and of the structure-dynamics-function relationship.

Indexed as

brain dynamicsbrain topologyfunctional networkshypergraphsintrinsical propertiesmultilayer networksmultiplex networksrenormalisation group

Identifiers

PMID41113446
PMCPMC12531195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.