Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113482›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of diabetes2025

Advances in gestational diabetes mellitus screening: Emerging trends and future directions.

Didem Kaymak, Ayse Seval Ozgu-Erdinc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Didem KaymakDepartment of Perinatology, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34098, Türkiye.
Ayse Seval Ozgu-ErdincDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara TR-06800, Türkiye. sevalerdinc@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a multifactorial metabolic disorder first recognized during pregnancy, with rising global prevalence and significant implications for both maternal and neonatal outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current diagnostic strategies, including standard screening protocols such as the one-step and two-step oral glucose tolerance tests, and evaluates their limitations in terms of sensitivity, timing, and practicality. The complex pathogenesis of GDM-centered on β-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, adipose tissue dysregulation, placental transport abnormalities, and neurohormonal imbalance-is explored in detail, highlighting the interplay of metabolic, inflammatory, and epigenetic mechanisms. Particular emphasis is placed on the emerging role of predictive biomarkers, encompassing metabolic, inflammatory, placental, urinary, and genetic indicators. These biomarkers, including adipokines, angiogenic factors, and microRNAs, offer promising avenues for early identification of at-risk individuals prior to the onset of hyperglycemia. The review also assesses recent advances in machine learning-based risk prediction models, which have demonstrated superior accuracy over traditional algorithms and may facilitate personalized screening and management strategies. Despite encouraging findings, challenges such as biomarker standardization, ethnic variability, and model validation persist. This review underscores the necessity for integrated, multi-omic, and patient-centered approaches to optimize GDM prediction, early diagnosis, and long-term risk reduction for both mother and child.

Indexed as

Early screeningGestational diabetes mellitusInsulin resistanceMachine learningPredictive biomarkersΒ-cell dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41113482
PMCPMC12531789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.