SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2025
Current state of research on acupuncture for acne: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acne vulgaris is recognized as one of the top eight most disabling dermatological diseases globally. Acupuncture has emerged as a clinically valuable and widely practiced intervention for acne, with the World Health Organization endorsing it as an effective non-pharmacological treatment. While existing evidence demonstrates acupuncture's ability to significantly improve acne symptoms, the research remains scattered and lacks comprehensive synthesis. This scoping review systematically maps the current clinical research on acupuncture for acne treatment to identify knowledge gaps and inform future research directions. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, AMED, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases to identify relevant studies published between January 2014 and October 2024. Data extraction and synthesis were performed using descriptive statistics and visual analytics. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and was prospectively registered with the OSF. Results: This study included 114 eligible studies, comprising 48 randomized controlled trials, 63 non-randomized interventional studies, and 3 systematic reviews, with the vast majority conducted in China. After 2019, the publication output of acupuncture studies for acne treatment showed a declining trend, which was generally consistent with changes in research funding. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment revealed that the overall methodological quality of RCTs was moderate, with a low proportion of high-quality studies. The main acupuncture interventions for acne included filiform needle acupuncture, pricking-cupping, fire needling, autohemotherapy, bloodletting therapy, and catgut embedding at acupoints, with Ashi point (local lesion area) being the most frequently selected acupoint. Among the 16 outcome measures evaluated, the effective rate was the most commonly used indicator. Overall, acupuncture demonstrated good safety in treating acne, although fire needling showed a significantly higher frequency of adverse events compared to other therapies. Conclusion: As a globally prevalent complementary therapy, acupuncture has established a substantial research base for acne treatment; however, methodological limitations persist in existing studies. Future research should conduct multicenter, large-sample randomized controlled trials adhering to standardized reporting guidelines, develop comprehensive efficacy evaluation systems incorporating objective indicators, and investigate connections between clinical outcomes and mechanistic pathways. These efforts will elevate the evidence level for acupuncture in acne management. Systematic Review Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S2QT6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.