Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115270›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Investigating Social Media Use by Young People to Self-Manage Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Large-Scale Analysis of Social Media Discussions Using Topic Modeling.

Yanan Ma, Lamiece Hassan, Sabine N van der Veer, Goran Nenadic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanan MaSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-6858
Lamiece HassanDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-422X
Sabine N van der VeerDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-436X
Goran NenadicSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-5363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media has shown promise in supporting young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) by providing information and emotional support. Although previous qualitative studies have investigated young people's self-reported use of social media for self-management, their patterns of actual use remain underexplored. Furthermore, different platforms may serve different functions or attract different types of engagement, making it important to examine how the patterns of actual use vary across them.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify and describe the topics that young people with T1DM discuss online and to identify differences in content across platforms.

methodsWe collected data from Twitter and two forums (Reddit and Diabetes.co.uk) spanning from January 2020 to January 2024, identifying young people with T1DM using rule-based criteria and profile age information. An efficient analysis pipeline, integrating topic modeling with large language model (LLM) summarizing and human verification, was applied to identify the discussion topics.

resultsWe analyzed 1765 tweets and 1259 forum posts by young people with T1DM and identified 24 topics. Among these topics, 7 (29.2%) were common across all platforms (Twitter and forums topic sizes, respectively): blood glucose management (n=70, 9%, and n=88, 16.6%), community and friendship (n=33, 4.3%, and n=51, 9.6%), COVID-19 (n=76, 9.8%, and n=13, 2.4%), diabetes and diet (n=81, 10.5%, and n=38, 7.2%), diabetes devices (n=97, 12.5%, and n=128, 24.1%), emotional and psychological expression (n=100, 12.9%, and n=124, 23.4%), and financial challenges (n=141,18.2%, and n=23, 4.3%). In addition, 7 (29.2%) topics were unique to Twitter: advocacy and awareness (n=35, 4.5%), diaversaries reflection (n=24, 3.1%), daily life and adaptation (n=27, 3.5%), misunderstanding of T1DM (n=25, 3.2%), educating and raising awareness (n=19, 2.5%), insulin prescription frustration (n=21, 2.7%), and experience with health care providers (n=25, 3.2%). Furthermore, 3 (12.5%) topics were unique to forums: diabetes complications (n=21, 4%), newly diagnosed and "honeymoon" experiences (n=21, 4%), and traveling with T1DM (n=24, 4.5%).

conclusionsAlthough our results confirmed social media's role in providing information and emotional and peer support, we also found that topics such as COVID-19, advocacy, and diabetes celebration are more frequently discussed in social media than in prior qualitative studies based on self-reporting. Platform-specific patterns are evident, with Twitter discussions being more immediate and experience driven, focusing on daily reflection, advocacy, awareness campaigns, and financial support, while forum-based platforms emphasize more in-depth discussions, where users seek and provide comprehensive advice, troubleshooting, and sustained peer support. Practitioners could consider the differences when designing digital interventions to ensure the delivery method aligns with the communication style and support needs of the target audience.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Self-ManagementSocial MediaAdolescentCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultlarge language modelLLMself-managementsocial mediaT1DMtopic modelingtype 1 diabetestype 1 diabetes mellitusyoung people

Identifiers

PMID41115270
PMCPMC12583938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.