ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A deep learning based automatic report generator for retinal optical coherence tomography images.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge-enhanced AI drives diagnosis of multiple retinal diseases in fundus fluorescein angiography.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading and summarizing insights from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images is a routine yet time-consuming task that requires expensive time from experienced ophthalmologists. This paper introduces the Multi-label OCT Report Generation (MORG) model, a deep learning approach to assist in the interpretation of OCT images. MORG employs dual image encoders to extract features from OCT image pairs, fusing them through a multi-scale module with an attention mechanism, followed by a sentence decoder to produce reports. Trained and tested on 57,308 retinal OCT image pairs, MORG achieved high classification accuracy for 16 pathologies with 37 descriptive types. It also excelled in a blind grading test against general large language models and other state-of-the-art image captioning models, scoring 4.55 compared to ophthalmologists' 4.63 out of a maximum of 5. Furthermore, MORG has the potential to reduce the report drafting time for ophthalmologists by 58.9%, significantly alleviating their workload.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.