Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid machine learning-enhanced MCDM model for transport safety engineering.

Xingjian Zhang, Haowen Chen, Jingxuan Chen, Hanrui Feng, Mingshuo Liu, Xushuai Zhang, Aaron Kaiqiang Zhou, Ziyan Li, Anqi Song, Ziang Wu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xingjian Zhang *Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Haowen Chen *Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jingxuan Chen *School of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China.
Hanrui Feng *Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Mingshuo Liu *Department of Software Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, Liaoning, China.
Xushuai Zhang *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Aaron Kaiqiang Zhou *Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Ziyan LiCollege of Radio and Television, Communication University of China Nanjing, Nanjing, 211172, Jiangsu, China.
Anqi SongSchool of Computer and Electronic Information, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China.
Ziang WuTandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY, 11201, USA.
Surui ChengStony Brook Institute, Anhui University, Hefei, 230039, Anhui, China.
Yuhan GanSchool of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Minghe LiuSchool of Management, University College London, London, E14 5AA, UK.
Junyu QuanDepartment of Mathematics, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Shuolei GaoSchool of Economics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Mingren ZhengTabor Academy, Marion, MA, 02738, USA.
Faan ChenSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. faanchen@seas.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivering reliable decision recommendations and policy inferences is essential for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) processes, particularly for transport safety engineering. This study proposes a hybrid machine learning-enhanced MCDM model that integrates distance correlation-based criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (DCRITIC), weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS), and K-means clustering, referred to as the DCRITIC-WASPAS-K-means model. In particular, we incorporated a machine learning tool (i.e., a graph-based technique) into the model to effectively and robustly select initial centroids. This integration addresses the uncertainty in traditional k-means clustering, which arises from varying initial centroids and its sensitivity to outliers, especially in datasets with noisy or skewed data points, and, more importantly, reduces the number of iterations and runtime cost. This approach improves the robustness and reliability of decision outcomes, thereby supporting more credible and actionable policy interventions. A case study involving transport safety engineering in the Organization of American States (OAS) region validates the model's practical utility. Comparative analyses demonstrate its superior performance in ensuring consistent decision outputs and communicating policy implications effectively. The proposed framework provides public administrators, policymakers, and government agencies with a reliable, scalable, and data-driven tool for strategic planning and resource allocation in uncertain environments.

Indexed as

Decision reliabilityGraph-based techniqueK-meansMachine learningOASTransport safety engineering

Identifiers

PMID41116017
PMCPMC12537915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.