Evidence mapPaperPMID 41116039Full record

SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

A holistic guide to effective prevention and treatment for kidney stones: a systematic review exploring anti-urolithiasis approaches.

Anood T Allam, Ahmed M El-Dessouki, Riham A El-Shiekh, Dina Abou-Hussein, Mahmoud Abdelmouti Mahmoud, Wagih H Marcus, Hassan A Ruby

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anood T AllamClinical Pharmacy Department at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed M El-DessoukiPharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahram Canadian University, 6Th of October City, Giza, 12566, Egypt.
Riham A El-ShiekhDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini Street, 11562, Cairo, 11562, Egypt. riham.adel@pharma.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-3352
Dina Abou-HusseinDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini Street, 11562, Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Mahmoud Abdelmouti MahmoudDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Wagih H MarcusDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Hassan A RubyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, 11562, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis, a disease of kidney stones, is a prevalent and recurrent condition characterized by the formation of hard mineral deposits in the urinary tract, leading to significant morbidity and a substantial healthcare burden worldwide. With recurrence rates ranging from 30 to 50% and a lifetime prevalence of 9-12% in industrialized populations, effective prevention and management strategies are crucial. Traditional approaches to urolithiasis, including pharmacological agents and surgical interventions, emphasize medical interventions and lifestyle changes; however, the persistent recurrence and impact on quality of life underscore the necessity for more comprehensive solutions. Recent advancements have focused on the potential of nutraceuticals, including herbal extracts, vitamins, and minerals, as adjuncts in the prevention and treatment of kidney stones. These agents may exert beneficial effects by inhibiting stone crystal formation, modulating urinary pH, reducing urinary calcium and oxalate excretion, enhancing diuresis, and supporting overall renal function. Moreover, these plant-based therapies may help alleviate symptoms such as pain and inflammation related to stone episodes. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 14 randomized controlled trials to assess the therapeutic impact and safety profile of various herbal interventions in patients with diagnosed kidney or ureteral stones. Thus, evidence from these recent clinical trials has increasingly supported the efficacy of single-herb and polyherbal formulations, such as Nigella sativa, Alhagi maurorum, Subap Plus, and Palasha Kshara, in modulating urinary risk factors and promoting stone expulsion. For instance, these trials demonstrated promising outcomes for several herbs: Portulaca oleracea significantly increased urinary citrate and reduced calcium, Traditional Persian Medicine-based Mofatet powder markedly reduced stone size and improved urinary parameters, Alhagi maurorum distillates and extracts showed comparable efficacy to hydrochlorothiazide in stone expulsion, and Nigella sativa performed as well as or better than tamsulosin in both pain relief and stone passage. Additional polyherbal remedies, such as Subap Plus, Palasha Kshara, and BNO 1040 extract, also yielded favourable results in improving stone clearance, easing symptoms, and potentially preventing recurrence. Notably, most studies reported good short-term tolerability and minimal adverse effects. Despite these promising findings, limitations in sample size, standardization of formulations, lack of comprehensive adverse events reporting, and need for long-term follow-up highlight the necessity for further rigorous trials.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUrolithiasisDietary SupplementsHumansPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPlant ExtractsKidney stonesNutraceuticalsRecurrence preventionUrinary healthUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41116039
PMCPMC12935727

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.