Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116152›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Challenges in opioid therapy implementation: national survey of palliative care consultation services.

Evelyn Mueller, Susanne Gahr, Annette Schnell, Eva Schildmann, Christopher Boehlke, Carmen Roch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evelyn MuellerInterdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, Würzburg, 97080, Germany. mueller_e10@ukw.de.
Susanne GahrDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitaetsstr. 21/23, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Annette SchnellCenter for Palliative Medicine, CCC Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz- Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Eva SchildmannPalliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Christopher BoehlkeDepartment of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Carmen RochInterdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, Würzburg, 97080, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care consultation services in hospitals can improve symptom control in patients with advanced illness by recommending or prescribing WHO step III opioids. However, effective treatment depends on the attending ward team which implements these therapies. While deviations from the opioid therapy recommended by the palliative care service and also treatment errors are often an issue in everyday life, there is no current data on the extent of the problem. This study explored the experiences of palliative care consultation services with the implementation of opioid recommendations by the attending ward team.

methodsThe questionnaire was developed through a multi-step process, including e.g. literature analysis and pre-testing with cognitive interviews. A closed national online survey was conducted via the SoSci Survey platform. All palliative care consultation services registered with the German Association for Palliative Medicine were invited to participate in November 2024, with a reminder sent three weeks later.

resultsThe survey was fully completed by 39 of 85 consultation services (response rate: 46%; 21 university, 18 general hospitals). Thirty-one consultation services provide recommendations for opioids, eight provide prescriptions. Most (23 of 39) reported a rather high or very high need for improvement in implementing opioid recommendations (4-point Likert-scale, very low - very high). Common deviations included "no implementation at all," "lower dose," and "non-implementation of medications to prevent side effects." "Inexperience or reservations about opioid therapy among attending ward staff" was the most frequently cited reason, named by 35 of 39 palliative care consultation services as occurring "sometimes" or "often" (5-point Likert-scale, "(almost) never" - "(almost) always"). Participants highlighted need for improvement in regard to symptom assessment, prescribing and use of PRN (pro re nata; on demand) medication, continuity of opioid therapy at discharge, and opioid treatment in the dying phase. Consultation services providing opioid recommendations reported significantly more frequent deviations from recommendations and a greater need for improvement compared to those prescribing opioids.

conclusionDespite a 46% response rate, limiting generalizability, the frequent reporting of collaboration challenges between palliative care consultation services and attending ward teams regarding opioid-based symptom control highlights a relevant problem. Targeted training could improve implementation and symptom management.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidAnalgesicsConsultationOpioidPalliative carePalliative medicine

Identifiers

PMID41116152
PMCPMC12539157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.