ArticleItalian journal of food safety2025
Probiotic-fortified
Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The probiotic bacteria and their encapsulated forms as food components: Survival, effects and quality.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent consumer perception of a nutritious diet improves demand for functional and safety products such as probiotics. The present research aims to investigate enriching Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) juice, including free and encapsulated probiotic bacteria. Initially, physicochemical attributes of encapsulations were evaluated. Then tomato juice samples, including a control without bacteria, free or encapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum, T1 and T2), Lactobacillus delbrueckii (L. delbrueckii, T3 and T4), and a mixture (T5 and T6), were prepared over 28 days of shelf life. Several assays were performed, such as pH, lycopene, turbidity, stability, antioxidant, probiotic viability, sensory, and structure. Physicochemical functions of encapsulation illustrated that the results were in the suitable range. The pH of all treatments declined, and free L. plantarum demonstrated a greater effect on reduction. The control and encapsulated L. plantarum samples exhibited the lowest lycopene, ranging from 0.64 to 0.35 μL/mL, while the highest ranged from 0.64 to 0.50 μL/mL during the shelf life. Encapsulated dual bacteria indicated higher turbidity, stability, and antioxidant features compared to the control throughout shelf life. The control maintained greater transparency than others, and microbial analysis indicated that probiotic populations were elevated until the 14th day and then reduced. The encapsulated dual-bacteria illustrated the maximum viability and sensory, while the control had the minimum ratings. Morphological analysis confirmed a homogeneous structure for encapsulated bacteria. Overall results depicted that treatments containing encapsulated bacteria are considered the preferred option to promote nutritious juice.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.