ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Peripheral T cell lymphoma following CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondary peripheral T-cell lymphoma in a patient with DLBCL harboringJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with refractory B cell lymphoma. However, rare cases of secondary T cell lymphomas have raised safety concerns. Here, we present a case of peripheral T cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) that developed eight months following CD19-directed CAR T cell therapy (lisocabtagene maraleucel) in a 66-year-old male patient with recurrent diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The patient initially achieved complete remission but later developed a subcutaneous mass and systemic lymphadenopathy. Histopathology and flow cytometry confirmed a diagnosis of PTCL-NOS with a CD3 + , CD8 + , and CD30 + phenotype, as well as clonal T cell receptor gene rearrangements. No immunoglobulin rearrangements were detected, ruling out a lineage switch. Furthermore, the CAR transgene was undetectable by RNA-in situ hybridization, and flow cytometry showed no CAR protein expression, suggesting that the lymphoma was not caused by CAR gene integration. This case highlights the importance of re-biopsy in cases of suspected relapse following CAR T cell therapy, and emphasizes the need for long-term monitoring. While a direct causal link remains unclear, industry-academia collaboration is crucial for investigating the mechanisms underlying secondary T cell malignancies and improving the safety of CAR T cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.