ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Outcomes of GLP-1 receptor agonist use following ischemic stroke: a propensity score-matched real-world analysis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and ischemic stroke severity.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2026Article
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Is Associated With Lower Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture and Rupture Severity.Stroke · 2026Article
- Association of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use with Stroke and Mortality Outcomes in Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis.Neurology international · 2026Article
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1As) have been shown to be beneficial in primary stroke prevention for high-risk patients. However, their benefits following major ischemic events are unclear. Herein, we present real-world analysis assessing outcomes of GLP-1A following major ischemic event.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX platform. Adults (≥ 18 years) with AIS treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) were identified; exposure was any US FDA-approved GLP-1A initiated within 6 months of the index stroke. The comparator was IVT-treated patients without GLP-1A exposure. Outcomes assessed at 5 years included major adverse health-care events (MAHEs): number of emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. One-to-one propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics. We estimated risk difference/risk ratio/odds ratio, 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) event probabilities with log-rank tests, and Cox hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs; small cells (≤ 10) were masked per data-use agreement.
resultsOf 69,005 eligible patients, 549 received GLP-1A and 68,938 did not; after matching, 432 per group were analyzed. GLP-1A exposure was associated with lower all-cause mortality (7.4% vs 14.1%; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.93), lower ED visits (37% vs 47%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95), and lower inpatient hospitalizations (31.9% vs 45.4%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.85); KM log-rank p ≤ 0.05 for all. Median time to first MAHE was longer with GLP-1A (1293 vs 897 days for hospitalization and 886 vs 603 days for ED visits).
conclusionsGLP-1A therapy after IVT is associated with favorable long-term safety and utilization signals and warrants confirmation in a prospective study with standardized initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41118000What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.