ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2025
Factors Affecting Circulating Phytosterol Levels: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Atherogenicity and Atheroprotection by Dietary and Circulating Phytosterols.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytosterols in human health: Biochemical mechanisms of action and disease-modulating effects.World journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
- The potential of metabolic engineering for sustainable phytosterol production.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
- Molecular genetic basis and clinical heterogeneity of sitosterolemia: focusing on the mutation spectrum and pathogenic mechanisms of ABCG5/ABCG8 genes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDysfunction of the ATP-binding cassette G5/G8 heterodimier (ABCG5/G8) leads to sitosterolemia, a condition in which premature atherosclerosis is often observed, thereby linking elevated circulating phytosterols to atherogenicity. Conversely, consumption of phytosterols reduces circulating cholesterol levels and, in animal studies, is anti-atherogenic. The debate over phytosterols' benefits vs. harms continues without consensus. Two key issues remain: despite extensive research, the etiology of premature atherosclerosis in sitosterolemia is still uncertain, and discussion of phytosterol atherogenicity has not been grounded in quantitative evidence, hindering true risk assessment. RECENT
findingsIn this review, we conducted a meta-analysis of circulating cholesterol and phytosterol levels prior to medical interventions in individuals with sitosterolemia. The analysis revealed that severe hypercholesterolemia manifests in the first decade of life but declines rapidly into adulthood, suggesting the presence of hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although ABCG5/G8-deficient animal models recapitulate the symptoms of sitosterolemia, including hematologic abnormalities and organ dysfunction, increased atherogenicity has not been observed in these models. By contrast, the consumption of phytosterol-supplemented foods minimally influences circulating phytosterol levels in the general population and lowers circulating cholesterol levels by approximately 10%. Mendelian randomization studies have indicated an association between circulating phytosterol levels and ASCVD risk; however, genetic background, sterol absorption efficiency, and metabolic disturbances modulate these levels, potentially confounding the interpretation of such associations. This review reframes the phytosterol atherogenicity debate through quantitative assessment and clarifies longstanding uncertainties about phytosterol safety, thus contributing to evidence-based risk evaluation and supporting informed clinical and dietary recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.