ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of stigmasterol derived AChE inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease using high throughput virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, poses a significant global health burden due to its intricate pathology and the absence of curative treatments. Current therapies primarily offer symptomatic relief, often with limited efficacy and complications, thereby underscoring the urgent need for innovative, safer, and more effective interventions. Stigmasterol, a plant-derived phytosterol, has demonstrated neuroprotective properties, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, which positions this sterol as a compelling candidate for further investigation in AD treatment. In this investigation, high-throughput virtual screening of 972 stigmasterol analogs (SAs) was conducted to identify potential acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, followed by ADMET filtering, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, MM/GBSA free binding energy estimations, and DFT calculations. Three lead compounds, including SA4 (-10.9 kcal/mol), SA12 (-10.6 kcal/mol), and SA15 (-10.5 kcal/mol), demonstrated superior binding affinities compared to stigmasterol (-9.6 kcal/mol) and the control drug donepezil (-8.6 kcal/mol). Docking interaction analysis revealed strong binding by hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, whereas pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicity assessments confirmed the favorable characteristics of these compounds. MD simulations (200 ns) demonstrated the structural compactness of the compounds, which was further supported by principal component analysis and Gibbs free energy landscape experiments. MM/GBSA identified SA4 as the most potent analog (-82.21 kcal/mol), followed by SA15 (-80.40 kcal/mol) and SA12 (-69.72 kcal/mol). A DFT-based molecular reactivity analysis revealed decreased reactivity and increased kinetic stability of the lead candidates in their transition from free to bound states. These findings provide insights into the therapeutic potential of stigmasterol analogs as AChE inhibitors, thus offering the groundwork for in vivo and in vitro validation for advancing AD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.