Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120604›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

The sperm quality change in 6 months recovery from COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.

Xiaoli Zhao, Yu Zhao, Nan Jiang, Kaixi Li, Jiaqi Xu, Ruihong Ma, Zuqian Luan, Tian Xia

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 and reproductive system: a scientometric study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoli Zhao *Department of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Yu Zhao *National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 88 Changling Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin, 300384, China.
Nan JiangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Kaixi LiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jiaqi XuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Ruihong MaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zuqian LuanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China. 15802290255@126.com.
Tian XiaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China. xiatian76@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has yielded substantial evidence indicating that SARS-CoV-2 may impair reproductive function, particularly by adversely affecting sperm quality. Given the potential implications for male reproductive health, it is crucial to assess the reversibility of such damage, determine the precise recovery timeline, and evaluate post-infection health parameters. Male patients who had undergone sperm analysis prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled to evaluate longitudinal changes in sperm quality during a 6-month recovery period. Sperm parameters were collected at five consecutive time points: before infection and at 1, 2, 3, 6 months post-infection. Additionally, quality of life (QoL), psychological status, and sexual function were evaluated via standardized questionnaires within the first month after infection. The primary outcomes were sperm concentration and progressive motility. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were applied for statistical analysis of repeated measures, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess temporal trends in sperm recovery. 1009 subjects underwent sperm analysis during widespread COVID-19 transmission, from April 2022 to January 2023. Among them, 139 eligible patients completed sperm analysis in the first month post-infection, with 92 (66%) patients were tested in the second month, 72 (52%) patients in the third month, and 64 (46%) patients completed the sperm analysis in the sixth month. The final analytical cohort comprised 74 participants with complete pre-infection baselines and ≥ 3 post-COVID-19 semen analyses at specified intervals (1, 2, 3, 6 months). Sperm concentration [39.22 (95% CI 32.02-46.41)] and progressive motility [36.41 (95% CI 32.29-40.53)] showed a significant decline at 1-month post-infection compared to pre-infection levels. Partial recovery occurred during the second and third months, though values remained significantly lower than baseline pre-infection levels at 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated median recovery times of 5 months (95% CI 4.57-5.43) for sperm concentration and 3 months (95% CI 2.08-3.82) for progressive motility, with no age-dependent differences observed (log-rank p > 0.05). Comprehensive assessments showed preserved psychological status, quality of life, and urogenital function at 1-month post-infection. Sperm quality was negatively impacted by COVID-19 infection, but temporary, with a recovery period of 3-5 months. Furthermore, no abnormalities were observed in men's psychological, urinary symptoms, or sexual function during the initial month following recovery from infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SpermatozoaAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Semen AnalysisSperm CountSperm MotilityCOVID-19Prostate symptomsPsychological statesSexual functionSperm quality

Identifiers

PMID41120604
PMCPMC12540804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.