ArticleScientific reports2025
Numerically induced attentional biases in horizontal, vertical, and two-dimensional shapes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that numerical magnitudes can induce attentional biases mainly in a horizontal space. The present study aimed to clarify spatial-numerical association in horizontal, vertical, and two-dimensional square stimuli composed of visually aligned strings of relatively smaller Arabic numerals (i.e., 1 or 2) or larger numerals (i.e., 8 or 9). Neurologically and psychiatrically healthy participants, all of whom were Japanese speakers, were instructed to identify the veridical center of the stimuli. The results indicated that, with horizontal stimuli, participants placed their subjective midpoint farther left when smaller numbers were presented compared to larger numbers, consistent with the predicted left-to-right mental number line. With vertical stimuli, however, smaller numbers induced biases upwards, inconsistent with the predicted bottom-to-top representation. For the square, the stimuli with number strings elicited biases with a stronger vertical component, whereas the stimuli without number strings elicited biases with a stronger horizontal component. The upward biases for the square stimuli with number strings may reflect the activation of object-based processing rather than the cognitive function of numerical processing. These findings suggest that distinct mechanisms may predominate over spatial-numerical associations with regard to the biases in the two-dimensional plane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.