ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Predictive power of combined inflammatory markers and magnetic resonance imaging features for glioma grading using machine learning: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the potential of integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features with inflammatory markers to predict glioma grading using machine learning models.
methodsA total of 179 glioma patients were analyzed. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (75%) and an independent test set (25%) to test hyperparameter. To enhance reliability, five-fold cross-validation was also applied during the training phase. Key MRI features and inflammatory markers, including relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC), monocyte count, lymphocyte-to-CRP ratio (LCR) and hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet index (HALP), were extracted and used as inputs for multiple machine learning classifiers. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1 score.
resultsThe support vector machine model exhibited superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.92 and an F1 score of 0.91, effectively distinguishing between high-grade and low-grade gliomas.
conclusionsThe combination of MRI features and inflammatory markers, analyzed through machine learning models like SVM, provides some clues for refining glioma prognosis and guiding personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.