Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121069›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

ACHO virtual assistant and digital care delivery for treatment adherence: a qualitative study of care practices and representations among nursing professionals.

Jerónimo Luengo Polo, David Conde Caballero, Borja Rivero Jiménez, Lorenzo Mariano Juárez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jerónimo Luengo PoloDepartment of Nursing, University of Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-2154
David Conde CaballeroDepartment of Nursing, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-4371
Borja Rivero JiménezDepartment of Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. borja.rivero@usc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-0968
Lorenzo Mariano JuárezDepartment of Psychology and Anthropology, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-7200

Funding

This work has been co-financed at 85% by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) and by the Regional Government of Extremadura. Managing Authority: Ministry of Finance of Spain GR24015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation ageing, together with the rise of chronic conditions, comorbidities, and polypharmacy, poses major challenges for ensuring therapeutic adherence among older adults. In this context, digital technologies emerge as potential support tools, although their integration into nursing practice warrants further investigation.

methodsThis qualitative study explored the experiences of primary care nurses in Extremadura (Spain) using a virtual voice assistant (Assistant on Care and Health Offline, ACHO) to support therapeutic adherence among older adults. In-depth interviews were conducted to examine nurses' views on ACHO's usability and the incorporation of digital technologies into daily care delivery.

resultsParticipants found ACHO intuitive and valued its offline functionality and custom features. Some saw opportunities for promoting independent living while improving medical data collection and follow-up care. However, concerns emerged regarding the potential weakening of fundamental professional values, such as empathy and face-to-face interaction, as well as risks to data confidentiality and demands for additional training and workload.

conclusionsDespite positive feedback on usability, nursing staff's deep-rooted professional values and ideological reservations remain significant barriers to the broader adoption of digital technologies in primary care.

Indexed as

AgeingE-healthNursingQualitative studyVirtual assistance

Identifiers

PMID41121069
PMCPMC12542280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.