ArticleBMC biology2025
A knowledge-driven deep learning framework for organoid morphological segmentation and characterization.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoid Intelligent Morphomics: Decoding the organoid morphome through artificial intelligence from phenotypic quantification to mechanistic insight.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- An AI-integrated organoid platform enables high-throughput functional evaluation of bioactive metal ions.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Review
- OrgLine: A versatile pipeline for organoid morphometry using detector-guided prompts.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Virtual Organoids (AIVOs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Biomaterials in organoid research: current state and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A knowledge-driven deep learning framework for organoid morphological segmentation and characterization.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrganoids have great potential to revolutionize various aspects of biomedical research and healthcare. Researchers typically use the fluorescence-based approach to analyse their dynamics, which requires specialized equipment and may interfere with their growth. Therefore, it is an open challenge to develop a general framework to analyse organoid dynamics under non-invasive and low-resource settings.
resultsIn this paper, we present a knowledge-driven deep learning system named TransOrga-plus to automatically analyse organoid dynamics in a non-invasive manner. Given a bright-field microscopic image, TransOrga-plus detects organoids through a multi-modal transformer-based segmentation module. To provide customized and robust organoid analysis, a biological knowledge-driven branch is embedded into the segmentation module which integrates biological knowledge, e.g. the morphological characteristics of organoids, into the analysis process. Then, based on the detection results, a lightweight multi-object tracking module based on the decoupling of visual and identity features is introduced to track organoids over time. Finally, TransOrga-plus outputs the dynamics analysis to assist biologists for further research. To train and validate our framework, we curate a large-scale organoid dataset encompassing diverse tissue types and various microscopic imaging settings. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms all baselines in organoid analysis. The results show that TransOrga-plus provides comparable analytical results to biologists and significantly accelerates organoid work process.
conclusionsIn conclusion, TransOrga-plus integrates the biological expertise with cutting-edge deep learning-based model and enables the non-invasive analysis of various organoids from complex, low-resource, and time-lapse situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.