ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Predicting deep vein thrombosis using machine learning and blood routine analysis.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Review of Recommendations, Evidence Gaps, and Emerging Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a serious health problem, causing local discomfort and hindering walking. It can lead to severe complications, including pulmonary embolism, chronic post-thrombotic syndrome, and limb amputation, posing risks of death or severe disability. This study aims to develop a diagnostic model for DVT using routine blood analysis and evaluate its effectiveness in early diagnosis. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patient medical records from January 2022 to June 2023, including 658 DVT patients (case group) and 1,418 healthy subjects (control group). SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was employed for feature selection to identify key blood indices significantly impacting DVT risk prediction. Based on the selected features, six machine learning models were constructed: k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: SHAP analysis identified ten key blood routine indices. The six models constructed using these indices demonstrated strong predictive performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.8, accuracy above 70%, and sensitivity and specificity over 70%. Notably, the RF model exhibited superior performance in assessing the risk of DVT. Conclusions: Our study successfully developed machine learning models for predicting DVT risk using routine blood tests. These models achieved high predictive performance, suggesting their potential for early DVT diagnosis without additional medical burden on patients. Future research will focus on further validation and refinement of these models to enhance their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.