Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122507›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2025

Predicting deep vein thrombosis using machine learning and blood routine analysis.

Jie Su, Yuechao Tang, Yanan Wang, Chao Chen, Biao Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie Su *Medical Neurobiology Laboratory, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Yuechao Tang *Baoding Second Central Hospital, Baoding, China.
Yanan WangMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, China.
Chao ChenMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, China.
Biao SongMedical Intelligent Diagnostics Big Data Research Institute, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a serious health problem, causing local discomfort and hindering walking. It can lead to severe complications, including pulmonary embolism, chronic post-thrombotic syndrome, and limb amputation, posing risks of death or severe disability. This study aims to develop a diagnostic model for DVT using routine blood analysis and evaluate its effectiveness in early diagnosis. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patient medical records from January 2022 to June 2023, including 658 DVT patients (case group) and 1,418 healthy subjects (control group). SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was employed for feature selection to identify key blood indices significantly impacting DVT risk prediction. Based on the selected features, six machine learning models were constructed: k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: SHAP analysis identified ten key blood routine indices. The six models constructed using these indices demonstrated strong predictive performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.8, accuracy above 70%, and sensitivity and specificity over 70%. Notably, the RF model exhibited superior performance in assessing the risk of DVT. Conclusions: Our study successfully developed machine learning models for predicting DVT risk using routine blood tests. These models achieved high predictive performance, suggesting their potential for early DVT diagnosis without additional medical burden on patients. Future research will focus on further validation and refinement of these models to enhance their clinical applicability.

Indexed as

blood routinedeep vein thrombosismachine learningprediction modelSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41122507
PMCPMC12535902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.