ReviewStroke2026
Distributed Precision Stroke Care: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Stroke Management Using Multimodal Sensor Data.
Review in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status and Associated Factors of Technophobia Toward Digital Health Technologies Among Older Patients With Stroke: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Digital Technologies Across the Stroke Continuum: From Risk Prediction to Real-Time Monitoring and Rapid Response.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Wearable Devices and Data Sharing in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Prevention in stroke - Current state, present gaps and probable next steps.Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Next-generation strategies for anterior cruciate ligament repair: constructing biointelligent ligament grafts integrating biomimetic design, immune modulation, and sensory feedback.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delays in stroke diagnosis contribute to long-term disability. Many patients still face barriers to effective risk factor management, timely detection, and access to poststroke rehabilitation. The emergence of artificial intelligence-enabled, consumer-facing health technologies offers a transformative opportunity to address these gaps across the stroke care continuum. This review examines the evolving role of artificial intelligence-powered devices, including smartwatches, smartphones, wearable sensors, and ambient home-based technologies, in enabling precision stroke care. For stroke prevention, these tools facilitate scalable monitoring of cardiometabolic and stroke-specific risk factors. For early detection, artificial intelligence algorithms applied to multimodal sensor data can identify subtle neurological impairments and support real-time triage. In recovery, artificial intelligence-enhanced remote monitoring and virtual supervision offer scalable models for delivering personalized rehabilitation outside of specialized centers. Although most of these innovations remain in early development, they signal a paradigm shift toward accessible, individualized, and data-driven stroke prevention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.