Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123334›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Collaborative Inference for Accelerated Failure Time Model Using Clinical Center-Level Summary Statistics.

Mengtong Hu, Xu Shi, Ziyang Gong, Peter X-K Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengtong HuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Xu ShiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ziyang GongCenter for Statistical Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Peter X-K SongDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-7182

Funding

Accounting for Hidden Bias in Vaccine Studies: A Negative Control FrameworkR01GM139926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHI, XU, TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Statistical methods for analysis of high-dimensional mediation pathwaysR01ES033656 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karen Eileen Peterson, Peter Xuekun Song · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
E3Gen: Multigenerational Influences of Social Structure on Toxicant Exposures and Life Course Health in the ELEMENT CohortU24ES028502 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN, SONG, PETER XUEKUN · 2023 to 2025
$1.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES033656NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES028502NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139926NIH HHS R01ES033656NIH HHS R01GM139926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-center clinical research offers numerous advantages, including the ability to obtain a larger combined sample size and to reduce center-specific insufficiency and imbalance in event rates, ultimately leading to more robust and generalizable findings. This paper develops a collaborative analytic framework for survival data analysis using summary statistics and the Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model, a popular alternative to the Cox proportional hazards model for the analysis of time-to-event data. The AFT model directly accounts for the effects of the covariates on times to event, rather than through hazard functions, with no proportionality assumption required compared to the Cox model. Given that it bypasses the construction of partial likelihood, it gives rise to more flexibility in integrative analyses of survival data collected from multiple clinical sites. Our proposed distributed inference method focuses on a class of parametric AFT models with Weibull, log-normal, and log-logistic distributions for time-to-event outcomes, with a distributed likelihood ratio test established under the generalized gamma distribution to assess the goodness-of-fit across different candidate parametric AFT models. We present large-sample properties for the proposed distributed method and illustrate its performance through simulation experiments and a real-world data example on kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMulticenter Studies as TopicComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansKidney TransplantationLikelihood FunctionsProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Analysisdata privacydistributed inferencemeta‐analysisrenewable estimationsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41123334
PMCPMC12542814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.