ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Portable AI-driven electrochemical aptasensor for real-time Staphylococcus aureus detection in food and beverages.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A portable electrochemical aptasensor integrated with machine learning was developed for rapid and on-site detection of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in food and beverage samples. The aptasensor was fabricated using screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and functionalized with an Iron-regulated Surface Determinant Protein A (IsdA)-specific aptamer for the detection of S. aureus. Approximately 2,000 cyclic voltammetry (CV) data points were collected for six different food and beverage matrices spiked with varying concentrations of S. aureus (1, 10, 500, and 1000 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL). Each CV scan was repeated 10 times, linearly averaged, and baseline corrected before model input. Noise filtering and normalization were performed to ensure consistent feature representation across training and testing datasets. Machine learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformer architectures, were applied to classify the samples. The CNN model demonstrated superior performance, with a test loss of 0.0402 and a test accuracy of 99.21%. In contrast, the Transformer model achieved a test loss of 0.2014 and an accuracy of 94.21%. To enhance usability, an Android application was developed using the Network Enabled Technologies (NET) framework, enabling real-time inference of bacterial concentration directly from CV data on mobile devices (e.g. smartphones). This system demonstrates potential for a rapid, accurate, and scalable solution for real-world food safety monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41123678What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.