Evidence mapPaperPMID 41123768Full record

ArticleAMB Express2025

Amikacin toxicity revisited: pentoxifylline offers protection in high-risk treatment scenarios.

Nada Moustafa, Mona B Abd El-Latif, Alyaa Farid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nada MoustafaBiotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Mona B Abd El-LatifEnvironmental Research Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.
Alyaa FaridBiotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. alyaafarid@cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0706-347X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amikacin (AMK), a potent aminoglycoside antibiotic, is clinically valuable for severe Gram-negative infections but is limited by its nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic effects, primarily mediated through oxidative stress and inflammation. This study investigated the protective role of pentoxifylline (PTX), a methylxanthine derivative with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, against AMK-induced organ damage in male BALB/c mice. Thirty mice were divided into six groups: control, AMK (100 mg/kg/day), PTX monotherapy (50 or 100 mg/kg/day), and AMK combined with PTX (50 or 100 mg/kg/day). After 28 days, biochemical, oxidative stress, inflammatory, and histopathological analyses were conducted. AMK administration significantly elevated renal (BUN and creatinine) and hepatic (ALT, AST and ALP) markers, increased oxidative stress (MDA), and upregulated inflammatory cytokines (IL-17), alongside histopathological damage in kidney and liver tissues. Co-treatment with PTX, particularly at 100 mg/kg, normalized these parameters, restored antioxidant defenses, reduced inflammation, and preserved tissue architecture. PTX demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy, with the higher dose offering complete protection against AMK-induced toxicity. These findings highlighted PTX's potential as an adjunctive therapy to mitigate AMK-associated nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, suggesting its clinical utility in optimizing aminoglycoside safety without compromising efficacy.

Indexed as

AmikacinInflammationKidneyLiverOxidative stressPentoxifylline

Identifiers

PMID41123768
PMCPMC12546230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.