ArticleThe European journal of general practice2025
Does one have to be queer to care for queer patients? A qualitative interview study with general practitioners in Germany.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLGBT* (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, others) individuals are known to experience poorer health and restricted access to healthcare compared to cisgender-heterosexual individuals.
objectiveAs General Practitioners (GPs) are a patient's first point of contact with the healthcare system in Germany, this study examines GPs' perspectives on LGBT healthcare.
methodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted 19 semi-structured episodic interviews with GPs in urban and rural areas of Germany. The interviews were analysed using framework analysis.
resultsOur study shows LGBT* doctors feel more responsible for LGBT* healthcare than their cis-heterosexual colleagues. There is a perceived lack of knowledge and learning opportunities on LGBT* health needs for most interviewees. Cis-heterosexual GPs often feel unprepared to provide specific healthcare interventions to LGBT* patients and believe they lack the resources to improve their education on the topic. LGBT*-specific primary healthcare seems to be delivered by a small number of GP practices and primarily by LGBT* doctors. These LGBT* doctors recommend more widespread knowledge of LGBT* primary care and lives, to allow their colleagues to provide better care for these patients.
conclusionThere is a lack of knowledge on LGBT health needs and challenges among GPs in Germany, which needs to be addressed through structured training in medical school, and on a postgraduate level. This lack of knowledge leads to cis-heterosexual GPs feeling more insecure in providing care to LGBT* patients and LGBT* GPs providing a bigger share of LGBT* healthcare than their cis-heterosexual colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.