ArticlePloS one2025
Cuts or carcasses? Diet form affects fecal microbial and animal fiber fractions in a large carnivore, the Asiatic lion.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut Microbiome Profile of Lions in Etosha National Park, Namibia.Research square · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of South China Tigers Under Different Dietary Treatments.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The care of exotic felids in zoos involves numerous factors, and the dietary management is currently considered particularly critical. This study investigated the effects of four different dietary regimens on the fecal microbiota and fecal characteristics of four female Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica) at the Rotterdam Zoo, the Netherlands. The lions were sequentially fed beef meat on bone (BM01, 4 weeks), degutted and skinned cattle carcasses (CC, 4 weeks), degutted but unskinned banteng carcasses (BC, 2 weeks), and then returned to beef meat on bone (BM02, 4 weeks). Feces were collected at day 28, 56, 70 and 98, and represented the total feces of the group between the last feeding and the next feeding. 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed significant microbial shifts at phylum level, including, between CC and the subsequent diets, a decrease in Proteobacteria abundance and increases in Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria (p < 0.05). Fecal characteristics varied by diet. CC resulted in the highest proportion of visible bone, and BC in the lowest. Fecal particle size was highest on BC, and fecal volume on BC was about twice that of other feeding regimes, suggesting a dilution by indigestible skin and fur components. Significantly lower levels of fecal ash, calcium and phosphorus on BC (p < 0.001) supported the dilution hypothesis. On all diets, ash was shown to be a significant part of the animal fiber in the feces (p < 0.001). Although unskinned carcass may have required greater chewing effort, potentially increasing bone fragmentation, the reason for the reduced bone intake remains unclear. While the exact intake of animal fiber could not be quantified, differences in microbial composition and fecal characteristics were associated with variations in the type of animal fiber, such as bone versus skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.