ArticlePLoS biology2025
Impeding pathways of intrinsic resistance in Escherichia coli confers antibiotic sensitization and resistance proofing.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Profiling the gut resistome to unlock antimicrobial resistance biology and inform clinical risk.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathways of intrinsic resistance in bacteria are promising targets for novel antibiotics and resistance breakers. Here, we used a genome-wide screen to identify single gene knockouts of Escherichia coli that were hypersusceptible to trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, two chemically diverse broad-spectrum antibiotics. Among the hits from our screen, knockouts of acrB, an efflux pump, and rfaG or lpxM, both involved in cell envelope biogenesis, were hypersensitive to multiple antimicrobials and could sensitize genetically resistant E. coli strains to antibiotics. Using experimental evolution under trimethoprim pressure, we show that high drug selection regimes drove these knockouts to extinction more frequently than wild type. Among them, ΔacrB was most compromised in its ability to evolve resistance, establishing it as a promising target for "resistance proofing." At a sub-inhibitory trimethoprim concentration, however, all three knockouts adapted to the antibiotic and consequently recovered from hypersensitivity, albeit to different extents. This recovery was driven by mutations in drug-specific resistance pathways, rather than compensatory evolution, frequently involving upregulation of the drug target. Notably, resistance-conferring mutations could by-pass defects in cell wall biosynthesis more effectively than efflux even though resistant mutations did not directly engage either pathway. Since inhibiting drug-efflux emerged as a better strategy, we tested the ability of chlorpromazine, an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), to resistance proof E. coli against trimethoprim. While qualitatively similar in the short term, genetic and pharmacological inhibition differed dramatically on an evolutionary time scale due to evolution of resistance to the EPI. Further, adaptation to the EPI-antibiotic pair also led to multidrug adaptation. The lack of concordance between genetic and pharmacological inhibition revealed a crucial lacuna in our understanding of the mutational repertoires that facilitate adaptation to antibiotics in bacteria. We propose that while intrinsic resistance mechanisms are effective targets for antibiotic sensitization, rapid evolutionary recovery may significantly limit their utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.