ArticlePloS one2025
Facial expression recognition reveals students' engagement in online class: Correlations with six engagement measurements.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence analysis of facial movements and satisfaction in online medical lectures: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of students' physiological arousal in personalized learning contexts: a quasi-experimental study based on electrodermal activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Student engagement assessment in online learning faces critical limitations: traditional methods fail to capture engagement's dynamic, multidimensional nature, particularly in second language (L2) contexts where emotional factors are paramount. This study introduces a novel multi-method framework that combines real-time facial expression recognition with dynamic self-reporting and observational measures to provide comprehensive, temporally-sensitive engagement assessment in synchronous online classrooms. Through analyzing a focused sample of Chinese L2 learners, we examined correlations between automatically detected happiness expressions and six established engagement measurements across both static and dynamic scales. Results revealed a significant and robust correlation between happiness expressions and self-reported emotional engagement, representing the study's primary validated finding. Additional correlations were found with specific mood indicators (happy and loving items). However, no significant correlations were observed with behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, or flow experience. The facial expression recognition successfully captured dynamic engagement fluctuations, showing modest but significant correlations with both retrospective self-reports and classroom observations. Our findings demonstrate that facial expressions serve as valuable indicators of specific engagement dimensions in online L2 learning, offering a targeted tool for emotional engagement assessment within comprehensive, multi-method evaluation frameworks in digital education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.