ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting and Assessing the Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy: Prediction Model Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Effective Model-Based Voting Classifier for Diabetes Mellitus Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From the energy factory to the intercellular communication medium: the emerging role of intercellular mitochondrial transfer and mitochondrial transplantation therapy in diabetes and diabetic complications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of occult diabetic kidney disease: implications for primary care screening.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN), a severe complication of diabetes, is characterized by proteinuria, hypertension, and progressive renal function decline, potentially leading to end-stage renal disease. The International Diabetes Federation projects that by 2045, 783 million people will have diabetes, with 30%-40% of them developing DN. Current diagnostic approaches lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for early detection and diagnosis, underscoring the need for an accurate, interpretable predictive model to enable timely intervention, reduce cardiovascular risks, and optimize health care costs. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model for DN in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a focus on achieving high predictive accuracy while ensuring transparency and interpretability through explainable artificial intelligence techniques, thereby supporting early diagnosis, risk assessment, and personalized clinical decision-making. Methods: Our retrospective cohort study investigated 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes using data from electronic medical records collected between 2015 and 2020. The study design incorporated a sample of 444 patients with DN and 556 without, focusing on demographics, clinical metrics such as blood pressure and glucose levels, and renal function markers. Data collection relied on electronic records, with missing values handled via multiple imputation and dataset balance achieved using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). In this study, advanced machine learning algorithms, namely Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), CatBoost, and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), were used due to their robustness in handling complex datasets. Key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and area under the curve, were used to provide a comprehensive assessment of model performance. In addition, explainable machine learning techniques, such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), were applied to enhance the transparency and interpretability of the models, offering valuable insights into their decision-making processes. Results: XGBoost and LightGBM demonstrated superior performance, with XGBoost achieving the highest accuracy of 86.87%, a precision of 88.90%, a recall of 84.40%, an F1-score of 86.44%, and a specificity of 89.12%. LIME and SHAP analyses provided insights into the contribution of individual features to elucidate the decision-making processes of these models, identifying serum creatinine, albumin, and lipoproteins as significant predictors. Conclusions: The developed machine learning model not only provides a robust predictive tool for early diagnosis and risk assessment of DN but also ensures transparency and interpretability, crucial for clinical integration. By enabling early intervention and personalized treatment strategies, this model has the potential to improve patient outcomes and optimize health care resource usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.