ArticleBlood advances2026
Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with R/R LBCL treated with CD3×CD20 bispecific T-cell engagers.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractT-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) offer a novel therapeutic approach for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL). However, predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients most likely to respond. As both bsAbs and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells represent T-cell-based therapies, we hypothesized that the established CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) and InflaMix models-reflecting the degree of systemic inflammation-could be of prognostic utility for bsAb therapy. We applied both scores to a multicenter international cohort of 174 patients with R/R LBCL treated with bsAbs across 15 sites. Patients with a high HT score (≥3, 35%) displayed inferior median progression-free (PFS; 1.4 vs 7.4 months; P< .0001) and overall survival (OS; 2.0 vs 21.7 months; P< .0001) compared with patients with a low HT score. When applying the InflaMix score, 49% of the patients were assigned to the inflammatory cluster, translating into a significantly shorter median PFS (1.9 vs 17.8 months; P< .0001) and OS (4.1 vs 21.7 months; P< .0001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis accounting for various prognostic factors, HT and InflaMix remained independent adverse risk factors for both PFS and OS. Patients presenting with both elevated HT score and the inflammatory signature showed markedly shorter OS and PFS compared with patients deemed low-risk by either one of the scores. In the CAR-pretreated subcohort, the combination of early CAR T-cell relapse (≤3 months) and elevated inflammation led to particularly detrimental outcomes. Overall, these data highlight the prognostic utility of baseline inflammatory markers in identifying patients who may benefit from combinatorial strategies alongside bsAb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.