Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125253›Full record

ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2025

Long-term outcomes of intramural rectal botulinum toxin injections for urge fecal incontinence: a salvage therapy for sacral neuromodulation nonresponders?

Philippe Onana Ndong, Véronique Vitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe Onana NdongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Véronique VittonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSacral neuromodulation (SNM) failure in fecal incontinence (FI) management represents a therapeutic challenge, often leading to more invasive, less accepted alternatives with inconsistent efficacy. In this context, intramural rectal botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection has recently emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative for urge FI. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intramural rectal BoNT-A injections in the challenging subgroup of SNM nonresponders.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study included patients with urge FI who underwent intramural rectal BoNT-A injections after SNM failure, between February 2018 and September 2024. The procedure involved endoscopic injection of 200 units of BoNT-A at 10 circumferential sites in the rectal wall. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for symptom severity.

resultsFifteen female patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 4.4-103.2 months). Patients received a median of 2 injections, with a median reinjection interval of 9.8 months. CCFIS scores demonstrated significant improvement (median, 15 [range, 8-20] vs. 8 [range, 0-20]; P=0.001), as did VAS symptom scores (median, 4 [range, 0-5] vs. 2 [range, 0-5]; P=0.001). No adverse events were reported.

conclusionThis study provides long-term evidence supporting intramural rectal BoNT-A injections as an effective option for managing urge FI, including as salvage therapy in SNM nonresponders. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and define the optimal role of BoNT-A within the therapeutic algorithm for urge FI.

Indexed as

Botulinum toxinsFecal incontinenceLong-term dataSacral nerve modulation

Identifiers

PMID41125253
PMCPMC12569780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.