ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Genomic prediction in a small barley population can benefit from training on related populations.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovering common and population-specific QTLs for leaf rust resistance in different Barley populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) has shown to be a valuable tool for genetic improvement in breeding programs but requires large training populations in order to build robust models. This is difficult to obtain for newly established breeding programs. Here, we aimed to overcome this challenge by combining datasets from 4 different barley breeding programs, utilizing up to 12 years of data to increase prediction accuracy in a more recently established 6-rowed winter (6RW) barley breeding program. By allowing data to accumulate in a breeding program as the years progress, we investigated when GP accuracy in 6RW benefitted from external populations. To do this, we focused on several parameters: training population size, choice of model for multipopulation GP (univariate versus multivariate), the key trait under investigation (grain yield, plant height, or rust resistance), and genetic distance between populations. We found that in the early stages of a breeding program, prediction of the 6RW population could benefit from inclusion of an external population, but the advantage depended on the specific population and trait under investigation. However, when data from all 4 years were available, multipopulation GP generally performed similarly to within-population GP. Additionally, when comparing multivariate and univariate models for multipopulation GP, the multivariate model often performed significantly worse, despite strong genetic correlations between the populations involved. This was especially the case when data were sparse and the model required estimation of numerous parameters from a small number of observations. Altogether, our results suggest that multipopulation GP is beneficial only in the very early stages of new breeding programs, emphasizing its relevance for newly established breeding programs or new breeding goals, especially for related populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.