Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125607›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Computational design and evaluation of optimal bait sets for scalable proximity proteomics.

Vesal Kasmaeifar, Saya Sedighi, Anne-Claude Gingras, Kieran R Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vesal KasmaeifarLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Saya SedighiLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne-Claude GingrasLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. gingras@lunenfeld.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6090-4437
Kieran R CampbellLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. kierancampbell@lunenfeld.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-5763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial organization of proteins within eukaryotic cells underlies essential biological processes and can be mapped by identifying nearby proteins using proximity-dependent biotinylation approaches such as BioID. When applied systematically to hundreds of bait proteins, BioID has localized thousands of endogenous proteins in human cells, generating a comprehensive view of subcellular organization. However, the need for large bait sets limits the scalability of BioID for context-dependent spatial profiling across different cell types, states, or perturbations. To address this, we develop a benchmarking framework with multiple complementary metrics to assess how well a given bait subset recapitulates the structure and coverage of a reference BioID dataset. We also introduce GENBAIT, a genetic algorithm-based method that identifies optimized bait subsets predicted to retain maximal spatial information while reducing the total number of baits. Applied to three large BioID datasets, GENBAIT consistently selected subsets representing less than one-third of the original baits while preserving high coverage and network integrity. This flexible, data-driven approach enables intelligent bait selection for targeted, context-specific studies, thereby expanding the accessibility of large-scale subcellular proteome mapping.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteomeProteomicsAlgorithmsBenchmarkingBiotinylationDatabases, ProteinHumansProteome

Identifiers

PMID41125607
PMCPMC12546598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.