ArticleNature communications2025
Computational design and evaluation of optimal bait sets for scalable proximity proteomics.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational design and evaluation of optimal bait sets for scalable proximity proteomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spatial organization of proteins within eukaryotic cells underlies essential biological processes and can be mapped by identifying nearby proteins using proximity-dependent biotinylation approaches such as BioID. When applied systematically to hundreds of bait proteins, BioID has localized thousands of endogenous proteins in human cells, generating a comprehensive view of subcellular organization. However, the need for large bait sets limits the scalability of BioID for context-dependent spatial profiling across different cell types, states, or perturbations. To address this, we develop a benchmarking framework with multiple complementary metrics to assess how well a given bait subset recapitulates the structure and coverage of a reference BioID dataset. We also introduce GENBAIT, a genetic algorithm-based method that identifies optimized bait subsets predicted to retain maximal spatial information while reducing the total number of baits. Applied to three large BioID datasets, GENBAIT consistently selected subsets representing less than one-third of the original baits while preserving high coverage and network integrity. This flexible, data-driven approach enables intelligent bait selection for targeted, context-specific studies, thereby expanding the accessibility of large-scale subcellular proteome mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.