Trial reportScientific reports2025
Rapid multiplexed nanopore amplicon sequencing to distinguish Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence from new infection in antimalarial drug trials.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid multiplexed nanopore amplicon sequencing to distinguish Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence from new infection in antimalarial drug trials.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Molecular surveillance of multiplicity of infection, haplotype frequencies, and prevalence in infectious diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Classification of outcomes in antimalarial therapeutic efficacy studies with Aster.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- SIMPLseq: a high-sensitivity Plasmodium falciparum genotyping and PCR contamination tracking tool.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Target product profiles of laboratory and data analytical frameworks for genotyping to monitor antimalarial efficacy.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Toward Setting Minimum and Optimal Data to Report for Malaria Molecular Surveillance with Targeted Sequencing: The "What" and "Why".The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Classification of outcomes in antimalarial therapeutic efficacy studies with Aster.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A NovelmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of antimalarial drug efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum requires molecular correction to distinguish recrudescence from new infections by comparing parasite genotypes before treatment and in recurrent infections. We aimed to assess the utility of nanopore sequencing in providing rapid corrected drug efficacy estimates, particularly in patients from high-transmission settings where polyclonal infections are common. We optimized a multiplexed AmpSeq panel targeting six microhaplotypes to achieve high and uniform coverage. The assay's sensitivity and specificity for detecting minority clones in polyclonal infections and its reproducibility were evaluated using a range of mixtures of four P. falciparum laboratory strains at defined ratios. Genetic diversity across the microhaplotype markers was assessed using 20 paired patient samples from a clinical trial. A custom bioinformatics workflow was used to infer haplotypes from polyclonal infections, including minority clones, applying rigorous cutoff criteria for accurate haplotype calling. The nanopore AmpSeq assay provided uniform and high read coverage across all six microhaplotype markers in both laboratory strain mixtures and patient samples. It demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting minority clones (as low as 1:100:100:100 in the 3D7:K1:HB3:FCB1 strain mixtures), high specificity (false-positive haplotypes < 0.01%), and robust reproducibility (intra-assay: 98%; inter-assay: 97%). The markers exhibited high genetic diversity (highest for cpmp with H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.