ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Weight-bearing MRI of the cervical spine: A scoping review of clinical utility and emerging applications.
Review in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging enables assessment of the cervical spine and craniocervical junction under physiological load, potentially revealing pathology that is occult on conventional supine imaging. This scoping review synthesizes current evidence, maps clinical and emerging applications, and identifies key gaps requiring further investigation. Methods: A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar (July 2025). Eligible studies were reviewed for diagnostic utility, technical considerations, clinical indications, and outcomes. Methodological quality was appraised descriptively in line with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Results: Nine studies, published between 2008 and 2025, met inclusion criteria. Upright and dynamic MRI detected posture-dependent changes including spinal canal narrowing, cord compression, foraminal stenosis, ligamentous buckling, cerebellar tonsillar descent, altered sagittal alignment, and CSF flow differences. Findings were more pronounced in flexion extension and upright postures compared with supine imaging. Normative studies established reference metrics for CCJ motion and prevertebral soft tissue width. Preliminary evidence also highlights applications in connective tissue disorders, Chiari malformation, and upper cervical chiropractic practice, although most studies were feasibility reports with small sample sizes and heterogeneous protocols. Conclusion: Emerging evidence suggests that WBMRI provides added diagnostic value in selected cervical spine and CCJ conditions by revealing dynamic or load-sensitive pathology not captured on standard supine imaging. While current evidence remains preliminary, standardized protocols, higher-field technologies, and large multicenter outcome-based studies are essential to validate diagnostic thresholds, improve reproducibility, and define the role of WBMRI in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.