Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127345›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Addressing binge eating in people with type 2 diabetes: Co-creating and feasibility testing dialogue tools based on a design thinking approach.

Pil Lindgreen, Loa Clausen, Helle Nergaard Grønbæk, Charlotte Humble Andersen, Khalida Ismail, Bryan Cleal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pil LindgreenDepartment of Prevention, Health Promotion, and Community Care, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark.
Loa ClausenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Denmark.
Helle Nergaard GrønbækDiabetes Clinic, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte Humble AndersenDiabetes Clinic, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark.
Khalida IsmailDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Bryan ClealDepartment of Prevention, Health Promotion, and Community Care, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Binge eating disorder may affect one in four individuals with type 2 diabetes, potentially leading to negative health outcomes. However, binge eating often goes unaddressed in diabetes care due to the absence of screening tools and the reluctance of patients to seek help due to shame and guilt. Objective: The study aim was to develop acceptable and feasible diabetes-specific dialogue tools to facilitate discussions about binge eating between patients with type 2 diabetes and clinicians, serving as a first step toward the detection and management of potential binge eating in this population. Design: The development and evaluation of the dialogue tools were conducted according to the Medical Research Council's complex interventions framework. Setting: Individuals with type 2 diabetes and clinicians were recruited from a specialized regional diabetes hospital during March to September 2023. Researchers were recruited from the same hospital and relevant research networks. Participants: The co-creation process consisted of 11 workshops and 16 individual feedback meetings with people with type 2 diabetes ( Methods: Applying a design thinking approach, the dialogue tools were co-created with individuals with type 2 diabetes, diabetes clinicians, and researchers with diabetes and/or eating disorder expertise. The dialogue tools were feasibility tested consecutively in routine diabetes consultations. Results: The study generated three dialogue tools aiming to facilitate discussions among clinicians and patients with type 2 diabetes about the patients' i) daily thoughts about food and drink, and whether they find these burdensome, ii) eating and drinking patterns, and iii) overall eating habits. Each dialogue tool included three parts; in part one, potential eating challenges in everyday life with diabetes are described, and the purpose of the exercise embedded in the tool is described. In part two, the patient actively carries out the described exercise, and in part three, the patient and clinician discuss follow-up questions. Parts two and three were designed to help patients recognize and reflect on their eating behaviors. Potential binge eating behaviors were identified in 25 % of the consultations, while other eating challenges that could impact diabetes management were commonly discussed in the remaining consultations. Conclusions: The dialogue tools may be effective in addressing not only binge eating but also other significant eating challenges in individuals with type 2 diabetes during routine diabetes consultations. Further research is encouraged to evaluate the tools in different settings.

Indexed as

Binge Eating DisorderDialogue ToolsDisordered EatingEating DisordersQualitative ResearchType 2 Diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41127345
PMCPMC12538684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.