ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025
Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Advances and Therapeutic Prospects.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myofilament-level effects of aficamten increase diastolic chamber volumes and maintain cardiac output through preserved length-dependent force generation in healthy rat and canine myocardium.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors (CMIs) and Surgical Referral in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Left ventricular flow components and myocardial deformation following treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a retrospective cardiac magnetic resonance-based cohort of mavacamtenCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited disease with substantial residual morbidity despite established pharmacological and surgical therapies. We conducted a narrative review of the current evidence on cardiac myosin inhibitors, drawing on published studies up to July 2025, including pivotal clinical trials, real-world cohorts, and pharmacokinetic analyses. Mavacamten and Aficamten consistently reduced left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients, improved New York Heart Association class, and were generally well tolerated under echocardiography-guided titration. Long-term extensions and real-world registries confirmed sustained efficacy, while pharmacogenetic factors and monitoring strategies continue to shape individualized use. Comparative analyses suggest Aficamten offers more rapid pharmacokinetics and simplified dosing, though both require careful safety surveillance. Remaining challenges include limited data in non-obstructive HCM, uncertain antifibrotic and rhythm outcomes, high cost, and the burden of frequent imaging and genetic testing. Beyond HCM, early studies are exploring broader indications and next-generation modulators. Cardiac myosin inhibition is reshaping the therapeutic landscape of HCM, but cost-effective, precision-based implementation and long-term outcome studies remain critical priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.