Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127363›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025

Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Advances and Therapeutic Prospects.

Lianglei Hou, Bin Lin, Xiaojun Ji, Anwu Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lianglei HouDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Bin LinDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojun JiDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Anwu HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited disease with substantial residual morbidity despite established pharmacological and surgical therapies. We conducted a narrative review of the current evidence on cardiac myosin inhibitors, drawing on published studies up to July 2025, including pivotal clinical trials, real-world cohorts, and pharmacokinetic analyses. Mavacamten and Aficamten consistently reduced left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients, improved New York Heart Association class, and were generally well tolerated under echocardiography-guided titration. Long-term extensions and real-world registries confirmed sustained efficacy, while pharmacogenetic factors and monitoring strategies continue to shape individualized use. Comparative analyses suggest Aficamten offers more rapid pharmacokinetics and simplified dosing, though both require careful safety surveillance. Remaining challenges include limited data in non-obstructive HCM, uncertain antifibrotic and rhythm outcomes, high cost, and the burden of frequent imaging and genetic testing. Beyond HCM, early studies are exploring broader indications and next-generation modulators. Cardiac myosin inhibition is reshaping the therapeutic landscape of HCM, but cost-effective, precision-based implementation and long-term outcome studies remain critical priorities.

Indexed as

Cardiac MyosinsCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicHumansCardiac Myosinscardiac myosin inhibitorsclinical studiesheart failurehypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID41127363
PMCPMC12539420

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.