ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Factors influencing type 2 diabetes in adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among adults in Zhejiang Province. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling technique was employed, and adults without known diabetes were included in the analysis. Food consumption was assessed using three consecutive days of 24-h dietary recall. Blood samples were collected to measure fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood lipids [total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 25-(OH)D vitamin D (VD), and vitamin A (VA). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were also measured. Ordinal regression was used to explore factors influencing T2DM. Results: The analysis included a total of 5,804 adults. The prevalence rates of T2DM and prediabetes were 5.5 and 5.8%, respectively. Significant differences were observed in age, sex, nutritional status, hypertension, and blood lipid levels among adults with normal fasting blood glucose, prediabetes, and T2DM ( Conclusion: This study revealed that adults aged 55 years and above, those who are overweight or obese, those with hypertension, and those with higher TG levels have a greater risk of developing diabetes. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to manage these risk factors in the prevention and management of T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.