Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127653›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2025

Automated morphological classification and quantification of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles

Mario Kurtjak, Vera Tomas, Leon Ivović, David Fabijan, Marko Perčić, Hrvoje Križan, Marin Tota, Lara Saftić Martinović, Janja Tarčuković, Ivan Štajduhar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mario KurtjakAdvanced Materials Department, Jožef Stefan Institute SI-1000 Ljubljana Slovenia.
Vera TomasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8321
Leon IvovićFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia ivan.stajduhar@uniri.hr.
David FabijanAdvanced Materials Department, Jožef Stefan Institute SI-1000 Ljubljana Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8166-6059
Marko PerčićFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia ivan.stajduhar@uniri.hr.
Hrvoje KrižanDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia mladenka.malenica@uniri.hr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2922-5620
Marin TotaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia mladenka.malenica@uniri.hr.
Lara Saftić MartinovićDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia.
Janja TarčukovićDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-0341
Ivan ŠtajduharFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia ivan.stajduhar@uniri.hr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-7972
Mladenka MalenicaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka HR-51000 Rijeka Croatia mladenka.malenica@uniri.hr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9030-5339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphology of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from cerebrospinal fluid is an important property that could uncover brain-related conditions. However, native morphology could get distorted during imaging, such as with atomic force microscopy (AFM) in air, which enables relatively simple visualisation and automated morphology assessment. Therefore, we compared 24 different preparation methods for the same sample of EVs according to the resulting size, height, aspect ratio and shape distributions obtained from the AFM images. We defined 5 different shape categories (round, flat, concave, single-lobed, and multilobed) and neglected other features that did not fit in either category and were considered artefacts. Artefacts affected the morphometric data (size, height, aspect ratio ranges and distributions), so their neglection was necessary for accurate morphometry. As this required a cumbersome and time-consuming manual search through all AFM images, we developed a computer program that facilitates the individual observation of each particle, enables manual shape identification and exports the resulting size and shape distribution from each AFM image. Since manual EV categorisation in the program still required significant time and proved to be quite subjective, we also employed machine learning for vesicle and shape recognition. A convolution neural network model was trained on a dataset of particles, for which 4 independent researchers provided consistent shape categorisations (

Identifiers

PMID41127653
PMCPMC12538302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.